Emeryville had its own just-cause eviction and relocation-assistance ordinance years before California’s statewide AB 1482 existed, and the local rule is still the stricter one on several points landlords routinely miss: Emeryville Municipal Code Chapter 5-40 applies from day one of any covered tenancy, with no waiting period like the one AB 1482 builds in, and its relocation-assistance amounts scale by how many units the landlord owns rather than using a single statewide formula.

If you’re a landlord or an owner of a tenant-occupied rental in Emeryville, the city’s own rulebook governs the eviction, not just the state’s.

Table of Contents

Why Emeryville’s Rule Predates and Differs From AB 1482

Emeryville adopted its Residential Landlord and Tenant Relations ordinance, codified at Municipal Code Section 5-40, effective April 1, 2017 — more than two and a half years before AB 1482 took effect statewide on January 1, 2020.

Where AB 1482 exempts tenancies in their first twelve months and carves out various property types, Emeryville’s local ordinance applies to every “covered unit” in the city from the start of the tenancy, with its own, narrower list of exemptions under Section 5-40.02(b): short-term rentals under thirty days, a single owner-occupied unit with two or fewer lodgers, nonprofit housing cooperatives, units whose rent is already controlled by a state or federal program, certain nonprofit elder-care facilities, and government-owned housing.

A landlord who assumes the familiar AB 1482 twelve-month exemption also applies inside Emeryville is working from the wrong rulebook — the two laws run independently, and the local ordinance generally applies regardless of how new the tenancy is.

The Three Things a Landlord Must Show Before Any Termination

Under Section 5-40.03, no landlord may terminate a residential tenancy in a covered unit unless they can demonstrate all of the following: that the landlord holds a valid residential landlord business license under Title 3 of the Municipal Code, that the landlord has already provided the tenant with the required notice of tenant rights under Section 5-40.07, and that the landlord served a notice of termination in the specific form required by Section 5-40.08 and delivered a copy of that notice to the City Clerk within ten calendar days of serving the tenant.

A landlord who serves a termination notice without holding a current business license, or without having previously issued the tenant-rights notice, has not satisfied the ordinance’s preconditions — and under Section 5-40.06, a tenant can bring a civil action to invalidate the notice of termination on exactly that basis, recovering attorney fees if they win.

For-Cause Terminations: The Ten Specific Grounds

Section 5-40.03(e)(1) lists the specific circumstances that qualify as a for-cause termination, and a landlord has to fit one of them, not just assert general dissatisfaction with the tenancy.

The list includes failure to pay rent after a proper three-day notice, breach of a material lease term, illegal activity in the unit, maintaining a dangerous or unsanitary condition that hasn’t been corrected, refusing to allow the landlord access after proper notice, rejecting a materially identical lease renewal, violating an occupancy limit (more than two people per bedroom plus one), a landlord returning from a sabbatical arrangement to reoccupy a unit that had briefly lost its owner-occupied status, a landlord returning from military deployment, and condominium conversion paired with the separate relocation payment required under Section 9-6.706 of the planning code.

None of these grounds requires paying relocation assistance — that obligation is specific to the separate “no fault” category.

No-Fault Terminations and the Relocation-Assistance Trigger

Section 5-40.03(e)(2) defines four no-fault grounds: the landlord will permanently remove the unit from residential use, the landlord or an immediate family member will move in and occupy it as a primary residence for at least two years, the unit must be temporarily taken off the market because it’s currently unfit for habitation, or the unit needs substantial renovation under permits the landlord already holds.

Any of these triggers both a relocation-assistance obligation under Section 5-40.04 and a right-to-return obligation under Section 5-40.02(j) — the tenant is entitled to notice when the unit returns to the rental market within two years, and to accept an offer to rent it back under substantially the same terms, provided they gave the landlord a current mailing address and respond within thirty days of the offer.

The one carved-out exception is a no-fault termination caused by a natural disaster or other naturally occurring event beyond the landlord’s control, such as a fire, earthquake, or flood — that specific circumstance doesn’t trigger the relocation-assistance requirement.

How the Relocation Payment Amount Actually Works

Section 5-40.04 splits the payment by the size of the landlord’s holdings in the city, and the amounts are larger than many landlords expect.

A “large landlord” — one who owns more than four covered units in Emeryville — must pay relocation assistance equal to either five times the current HUD fair market rent for the Oakland-Fremont metro area, or four times the tenant’s actual current monthly rent, whichever is greater.

A “small landlord” — four or fewer covered units, or any group residential facility regardless of size — pays the lesser of those two formulas’ logic but at a smaller multiple: one month of the HUD fair market rent, or one month of the tenant’s actual rent, whichever is greater.

In both cases the payment must be divided equally among every tenant occupying the unit when the notice of termination is delivered, and it has to reach the tenant by the last day of the tenancy for which the landlord collected rent — a landlord can pay it earlier, alongside the termination notice, but can’t defer it past move-out.

Working Through What the Relocation Formula Actually Means in Practice

The “whichever is greater” structure in Section 5-40.04 matters because the two figures it compares move independently.

The HUD fair market rent for the Oakland-Fremont metro area is published annually and reflects regional rents broadly, while the tenant’s actual rent reflects whatever that specific unit has been charging, which in a long-tenured, rent-controlled unit can be well below current market.

For a large landlord, that means the calculation isn’t simply “four months of whatever this tenant pays” — it’s four times the tenant’s actual rent compared against five times the published HUD figure, with the landlord owing the larger of the two results.

In a unit where the tenant’s below-market rent has stayed flat for years under rent control, the HUD-based five-times figure will often be the larger number and therefore the one actually owed, which can produce a relocation payment meaningfully higher than a landlord estimating off the tenant’s rent alone would expect.

Pulling the current HUD Oakland-Fremont fair market rent figure before estimating any relocation cost, rather than assuming the rent-based calculation controls, avoids underestimating what’s required.

The Notice of Termination Isn’t a Generic Form

Section 5-40.08 requires a specific notice format, not an ordinary thirty- or sixty-day notice borrowed from a standard lease template.

The form has to state the specific reason for termination by checking one of the enumerated for-cause or no-fault grounds, include the tenant-rights notice from Section 5-40.07, and list the contractual rent charged for each of the prior years of the tenancy.

A copy goes to the City Clerk’s office at 1333 Park Avenue within ten days of service on the tenant, along with the underlying rental agreement.

Leaving out the rent history, citing a reason that isn’t one of the ordinance’s enumerated grounds, or skipping the City Clerk filing are all independent grounds a tenant can raise in a civil action to invalidate the notice under Section 5-40.06, separate from any dispute about whether the underlying reason for the termination was true.

When the Tenant-Rights Notice Has to Be Delivered

The tenant-rights notice required under Section 5-40.07 isn’t a one-time document handed over at move-in and then forgotten.

The ordinance requires landlords to deliver it at several distinct points: when a tenancy begins, when a lease is renewed, alongside any notice of termination, and at any other time the City of Emeryville specifies, which has historically included after significant amendments to the chapter.

A landlord who delivered the notice correctly at the start of a tenancy five years ago but never re-delivered it with the termination notice has still failed to satisfy Section 5-40.03(b)’s precondition for a valid termination, even though the tenant technically received the substance of the notice once before.

Because this is one of the preconditions a tenant can challenge in a civil action under Section 5-40.06, landlords who keep a dated, signed acknowledgment of each delivery are in a materially stronger position if a termination is later contested than one relying on memory or an assumption that an earlier delivery still counts.

The Harassment Provisions Run Alongside the Eviction Rules

Section 5-40.05 separately prohibits a list of landlord conduct done in bad faith to pressure a tenant into leaving outside the formal eviction process: cutting off or threatening to cut off housing services, refusing to make required repairs, misusing the right of access, removing a tenant’s property, offering a tenant payment to vacate more than once every six months, or any pattern of conduct intended to make the tenant leave through discomfort rather than a lawful notice.

This matters for a landlord trying to resolve a tenant-occupied property before a sale — an owner under time pressure who starts reducing services or repeatedly offering buyout money to speed a tenant’s departure can create a harassment claim that complicates the eventual sale, independent of whatever the actual termination notice says.

What a Tenant Can Challenge, and What It Costs the Landlord

Section 5-40.06 gives tenants a private right of action separate from whatever happens in an unlawful detainer proceeding.

A tenant served with a notice of termination can file a civil action specifically to contest whether each of the Section 5-40.03 preconditions was actually met — the business license, the prior tenant-rights notice, the proper form of the termination notice, and a valid enumerated ground — and can seek an injunction to halt the termination while that’s litigated.

If the landlord can’t demonstrate compliance with any one of those elements by a preponderance of the evidence, the notice is invalidated outright, and the tenant is entitled to recover costs and reasonable attorney fees for having to bring the action.

The one exception is the requirement to file a copy with the City Clerk: failing that step alone doesn’t invalidate the notice to the tenant, though it’s still a separate municipal violation.

This fee-shifting structure is why Emeryville landlord attorneys treat the ordinance’s procedural requirements as substantive rather than clerical — a termination that’s substantively justified can still be unwound, at real cost to the landlord, over a missed procedural step.

How This Interacts With a Sale in Progress

An owner selling a tenant-occupied Emeryville property doesn’t get a shortcut around Chapter 5-40 just because a sale is pending — a change in ownership doesn’t terminate a tenancy, and a new owner who wants the unit vacant still has to serve a valid notice of termination under one of the enumerated grounds, pay relocation assistance if it’s a no-fault termination, and honor any existing right-to-return obligation left over from a prior owner’s termination.

Buyers evaluating a tenant-occupied purchase in Emeryville should confirm whether any notice of termination has already been filed with the City Clerk on the property, since an active notice and its associated relocation-assistance obligation transfer with the property rather than resetting at closing.

We go through the broader set of considerations that apply when selling a tenant-occupied property anywhere in the region, including how buyers price in existing lease terms, on our Bay Area tenant-occupied selling page.

How This Compares to the Statewide AB 1482 Framework

It’s worth being precise about what Emeryville’s ordinance changes relative to the state law that came after it.

AB 1482 also requires just cause and relocation assistance for no-fault terminations statewide, but its relocation amount is a flat one month of rent (or a rent waiver for the final month) regardless of landlord size, and it carves out an exemption for the tenancy’s first twelve months and for various smaller or newer properties.

Emeryville’s ordinance doesn’t track either of those features — it applies from the start of a covered tenancy with no twelve-month exemption, and its relocation amount for a large landlord (five times HUD fair market rent, or four times actual rent) is substantially higher than AB 1482’s flat one-month standard.

We go through how the statewide formula itself is calculated, including its rent-cap mechanics, in our explainer on California’s AB 1482 rent cap.

Where the two laws overlap, a landlord generally has to comply with whichever is more protective of the tenant on that specific point — and in Emeryville, that’s frequently the local ordinance rather than the state law that came afterward.

What to Check Before Serving Any Notice

Before serving a termination notice on an Emeryville tenancy, an owner should confirm the unit doesn’t fall within one of the Section 5-40.02(b) exemptions, confirm the business license required under Title 3 is current, have the tenant-rights notice already on file as having been delivered, identify which specific enumerated ground under Section 5-40.03(e) actually applies rather than a general description of the circumstances, and calculate the relocation-assistance amount using the landlord’s correct size classification and the current published HUD fair market rent figure for the Oakland-Fremont area, since that figure changes annually and an outdated number can understate what’s actually owed.

When This Makes Selling As-Is the Simpler Path

For an owner who wants out of a tenant-occupied Emeryville rental without personally managing a no-fault termination, calculating and paying the correct relocation amount, and tracking a two-year right-to-return obligation afterward, selling the property as-is with the tenancy in place shifts that entire process to a buyer who’s prepared to take it on directly.

That’s often the more practical option for an owner who inherited the property, who has multiple small rentals across different cities with inconsistent local rules, or who simply doesn’t want the exposure that comes with a harassment claim or an invalidated notice if a step gets missed.

A cash sale also avoids the timing problem of trying to coordinate a tenant’s move-out, a relocation payment, and a closing date all at once.

Getting a Straightforward Offer Instead

If you own a tenant-occupied property in Emeryville and would rather not manage the notice, relocation-payment, and right-to-return requirements yourself, Cash Home Buyers CA can make a no-obligation cash offer on the property as it sits today, tenant in place. You can read what California sellers say about working with us on our Google listing.

Emeryville’s Just Cause Eviction Ordinance: Relocation Pay Under Municipal Code 5-40